gd,jb,swvps 三家vps速度测试

inori · 发表于 2008-10-2 00:46:25

基本上我觉得JB会比较快点

毕竟是SL的机房嘛

jeffreyhhh · 发表于 2008-10-2 00:50:24

原帖由 angelstar 于 2008-10-2 12:36 AM 发表
swvps 是流氓，一不高兴可以随意销毁客户的数据，只对数据无所谓的垃圾站适用

结下了那么大的梁子呀

chris330 · 发表于 2008-10-2 03:05:44

深圳电信ADSL

C:\>ping www.leoidea.com

Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=287ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=48
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 280ms, Maximum = 287ms, Average = 282ms

C:\>ping 38.99.249.51

Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=53
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=53
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=53
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 190ms, Maximum = 190ms, Average = 190ms

C:\>ping 97.74.73.54

Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=47
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=47
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=47
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 198ms, Maximum = 198ms, Average = 198ms

kingto · 发表于 2008-10-2 07:48:21

看来chris访问我的站速度也不错

leitian · 发表于 2008-10-2 08:56:24

我的德州的机房的

kingto · 发表于 2008-10-2 10:31:43

Microsoft Windows [版本 6.0.6001]
版权所有 (C) 2006 Microsoft Corporation。保留所有权利。

C:\Users\Lloyd>ping www.leoidea.com

正在 Ping www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 208.43.16.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=260ms TTL=46
来自 208.43.16.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=259ms TTL=46
来自 208.43.16.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=260ms TTL=46
来自 208.43.16.56 的回复: 字节=32 时间=260ms TTL=46

208.43.16.56 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 259ms，最长 = 260ms，平均 = 259ms

C:\Users\Lloyd>ping 38.99.249.51

正在 Ping 38.99.249.51 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 38.99.249.51 的回复: 字节=32 时间=221ms TTL=52
来自 38.99.249.51 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
来自 38.99.249.51 的回复: 字节=32 时间=220ms TTL=52
来自 38.99.249.51 的回复: 字节=32 时间=222ms TTL=52

38.99.249.51 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 220ms，最长 = 222ms，平均 = 220ms

C:\Users\Lloyd>ping 97.74.73.54

正在 Ping 97.74.73.54 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 97.74.73.54 的回复: 字节=32 时间=239ms TTL=46
来自 97.74.73.54 的回复: 字节=32 时间=238ms TTL=46
来自 97.74.73.54 的回复: 字节=32 时间=238ms TTL=46
来自 97.74.73.54 的回复: 字节=32 时间=240ms TTL=46

97.74.73.54 的 Ping 统计信息:
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 238ms，最长 = 240ms，平均 = 238ms

诡谲 · 发表于 2008-10-2 18:27:42

广东揭阳电信4M
我的最详细了....我本人的VPS也是SWVPS.感觉是SWVPS最快了.但是稳定性方面我就不太清楚了.感觉就还可以.

Microsoft Windows XP [版本 5.1.2600]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping www.leoidea.com

Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=53
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=53
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=277ms TTL=53
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=279ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 277ms, Maximum = 280ms, Average = 278ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 38.99.249.51

Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=196ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 196ms, Maximum = 199ms, Average = 197ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 97.74.73.54

Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 247ms, Maximum = 251ms, Average = 249ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.leoidea.com

Tracing route to www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    1 ms <1 ms <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms  1.160.16.218.broad.jy.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn [218.16.160.1]
  3 23 ms 23 ms 30 ms  202.104.229.118
  4 32 ms 34 ms 32 ms  radius.jieyang.net.cn [202.104.227.21]
  5 32 ms 31 ms 32 ms  202.97.40.21
  6 33 ms 29 ms 36 ms  202.97.33.169
  7 190 ms 189 ms 191 ms  202.97.51.170
  8 250 ms 232 ms 231 ms  p16-0-1-2.r20.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.8.141]
  9 234 ms 233 ms 232 ms  ae-0.r21.snjsca04.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.97]
10 237 ms 237 ms 239 ms  as-0.r21.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.24]
11 240 ms 240 ms 239 ms  po-3.r03.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.182]
12 274 ms 233 ms 234 ms  te1-1.cer01.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com [157.238.228.10]
13 233 ms 232 ms 234 ms  po2.dar02.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com [66.228.118.207]
14 230 ms 234 ms 233 ms  po2.fcr04.dal01.dallas-datacenter.com [66.228.118.218]
15 235 ms 232 ms 235 ms  vpslogin.com [67.228.245.26]
16 276 ms 276 ms 275 ms  208.43.16.56-static.reverse.softlayer.com [208.43.16.56]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert 38.99.249.51

Tracing route to 38-99-249-51.hosted.sta.webnx.com [38.99.249.51]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    1 ms <1 ms <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2 28 ms 29 ms 29 ms  1.160.16.218.broad.jy.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn [218.16.160.1]
  3 22 ms 23 ms 24 ms  202.104.229.118
  4 31 ms 32 ms 32 ms  radius.jieyang.net.cn [202.104.227.21]
  5 33 ms 30 ms 28 ms  202.97.40.165
  6 29 ms 29 ms 32 ms  202.97.34.14
  7 198 ms 196 ms 197 ms  202.97.51.86
  8 195 ms 195 ms 193 ms  218.30.54.110
  9 195 ms 195 ms 194 ms  vl3505.na21.b002695-2.lax04.atlas.cogentco.com [66.28.64.2]
10 197 ms 198 ms 200 ms  38.99.246.26
11 195 ms 197 ms 196 ms  38-99-249-242.hosted.sta.webnx.com [38.99.249.242]
12 199 ms 199 ms 195 ms  38-99-249-51.hosted.sta.webnx.com [38.99.249.51]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert 97.74.73.54

Tracing route to ip-97-74-73-54.ip.secureserver.net [97.74.73.54]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    1 ms <1 ms <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2 30 ms 29 ms 29 ms  1.160.16.218.broad.jy.gd.dynamic.163data.com.cn [218.16.160.1]
  3 25 ms 25 ms 25 ms  202.104.229.114
  4 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms  202.104.227.17
  5 32 ms 32 ms 29 ms  61.140.0.45
  6 34 ms 34 ms 29 ms  202.97.33.98
  7 184 ms 183 ms 185 ms  202.97.51.134
  8 191 ms 187 ms 190 ms  sjp-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [63.146.26.205]
  9 186 ms 189 ms 186 ms  snj-core-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.233.21]
10 207 ms 205 ms 208 ms  phn-core-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.19.34]
11 272 ms 257 ms 208 ms  scd-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.12.46]
12 287 ms 407 ms 232 ms  63.227.225.70
13 207 ms 208 ms 209 ms  ip-208-109-113-149.ip.secureserver.net [208.109.113.149]
14 208 ms 210 ms 209 ms  ip-208-109-113-174.ip.secureserver.net [208.109.113.174]
15 209 ms 209 ms 209 ms  s2vph029.prod.sdl2.secureserver.net [97.74.73.223]
16 248 ms 249 ms 247 ms  ip-97-74-73-54.ip.secureserver.net [97.74.73.54]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

kingto · 发表于 2008-10-2 18:30:32

增加這麼多人，速度規律還是一樣：

sw第一 GD第二 JB第三

诡谲 · 发表于 2008-10-2 22:10:45

原帖由 kingto 于 2008-10-2 06:30 PM 发表
增加這麼多人，速度規律還是一樣：

sw第一 GD第二 JB第三

是的.刚才找几个朋友测试,发现速度的确可以,晚上这个时候下载和早上下载的速度相差不大,都保持在160kb/s,本地带宽是2M

shit386 · 发表于 2008-10-2 22:57:23

大家技术来测试

人越多越准确啊~