gd,jb,swvps 三家vps速度测试

shit386

如下三位老大各自买的vps(vds)，大家都来ping一下速度，并给出自己的ISP(电信、网通……)，也好做个对比。

jB：http://www.leoidea.com

swvp：http://38.99.249.51

gd：http://97.74.73.54


**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
本人用上海网通
______________

Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=46
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=244ms TTL=46
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=246ms TTL=46
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 244ms, Maximum = 256ms, Average = 249ms

______________

Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=198ms TTL=51
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=51
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=51
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 198ms, Maximum = 200ms, Average = 199ms

______________

Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=214ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=212ms TTL=43

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 212ms, Maximum = 227ms, Average = 217ms
______________

大家都来测试下。注意说明isp哦

kingto

第三個是我的

等會測評  

niwo.pp.ru

河南网通百独
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=234ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=43
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=43

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 234ms, Maximum = 235ms, Average = 234ms

**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=50
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=207ms TTL=50
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=50
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=208ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 207ms, Maximum = 208ms, Average = 207ms


**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************

Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=236ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 235ms, Maximum = 236ms, Average = 235ms

shit386

期待 电信 用户的 测试结果

niwo.pp.ru

河南百独电信
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=278ms TTL=46
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=46
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=46
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=278ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 275ms, Maximum = 278ms, Average = 276ms

**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=52
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=222ms TTL=52
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=52
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 222ms, Average = 221ms

**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=301ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=294ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=295ms TTL=47
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=304ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 294ms, Maximum = 304ms, Average = 298ms

jeffreyhhh

广西桂林电信的，感觉是swvps最快啦，gd次之，jb最慢，



C:\>ping www.leoidea.com

Pinging www.leoidea.com [208.43.16.56] with 32 bytes of d

Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=351ms TTL=49
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=49
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=49
Reply from 208.43.16.56: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 208.43.16.56:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 351ms, Maximum = 359ms, Average = 357ms


C:\>ping 38.99.249.51

Pinging 38.99.249.51 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=224ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=54
Reply from 38.99.249.51: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 38.99.249.51:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 218ms, Maximum = 224ms, Average = 219ms

C:\>ping 97.74.73.54

Pinging 97.74.73.54 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=280ms TTL=48
Reply from 97.74.73.54: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 97.74.73.54:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 280ms, Maximum = 282ms, Average = 281ms

kingto

桂林电信不錯

kingto

经过大家的测试，可以总结出：swvps最快，gd第二，jb第三

另外还发现，我的GD VDS比idcspy的ping还快

[ 本帖最后由 kingto 于 2008-10-1 12:58 PM 编辑 ]

shit386

[quote]原帖由 kingto 于 2008-10-1 08:55 PM 发表
经过大家的测试，可以总结出：swvps最快，gd第二，jb第三

老大~ 你也太早做总结了吧，你看都每人来测速度了...

angelstar

swvps 是流氓，一不高兴可以随意销毁客户的数据，只对数据无所谓的垃圾站适用